Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hassell Smith v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, 91-2388 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-2388 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 29, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 963 F.2d 368 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Hassell SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-2388. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: April 20, 1992 Decided: May 29, 1992 Appeal from the United S
More

963 F.2d 368

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Hassell SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-2388.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1992
Decided: May 29, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-91-506-R)

Hassell Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Guy M. Harbert, III, Melissa Warner Scoggins, Gentry, Locke, Rakes & Moore, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Hassell Smith appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil suit. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. State Farm Fire and Casualty, Co., No. CA-91-506-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 26, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer