Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Charles E. Carter, and Charles Henry Carter Alysia Carter v. Harford County Circuit Court Gloria Judkins Carter, 91-2729 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-2729 Visitors: 43
Filed: Feb. 12, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 954 F.2d 720 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Charles E. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Charles Henry CARTER; Alysia Carter, Plaintiffs, v. Harford County Circuit Court; Gloria Judkins Carter, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-2729. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
More

954 F.2d 720

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles E. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Charles Henry CARTER; Alysia Carter, Plaintiffs,
v.
Harford County Circuit Court; Gloria Judkins Carter,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-2729.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.
Decided Feb. 11, 1992.
As Amended Feb. 12, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-91-2556-HAR).

Charles E. Carter, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Charles E. Carter appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Harford, No. CA-91-2556-HAR (D.Md. Oct. 30, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer