Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Milton Mark Smith, A/K/A Pete, 91-5637 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-5637 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 03, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 953 F.2d 641 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Milton Mark SMITH, a/k/a Pete, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-5637. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 22, 1991. Decided Feb. 3, 1992. Appeal from the Unite
More

953 F.2d 641

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Milton Mark SMITH, a/k/a Pete, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-5637.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 22, 1991.
Decided Feb. 3, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-195-G)

James W. Swindell, High Point, N.C., for appellant.

Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., United States Attorney, Michael F. Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, N.C., for appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and GERALD W. HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Milton Mark Smith was convicted of conspiracy to possess cocaine base with the intent to distribute and possession of cocaine base with the intent to distribute. 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a), 846 (West 1981 & Supp.1991). Smith's attorney submitted this appeal pursuant to the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that police lacked probable cause for Smith's arrest. This issue was not presented to the district court, and our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer