Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Bahauddin Khan Khattak, A/K/A Bahoudi, 91-6313 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6313 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 03, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 343 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bahauddin Khan KHATTAK, a/k/a Bahoudi, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-6313. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: February 21, 1992 Decided: July 31, 1992 As Amend
More

972 F.2d 343

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bahauddin Khan KHATTAK, a/k/a Bahoudi, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-6313.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 21, 1992
Decided: July 31, 1992
As Amended Sept. 3, 1992.

Bahauddin Khan Khattak, Appellant Pro Se.

Christine Fay Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Bahauddin Khan Khattak appeals from the district court's refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Khattak, Nos. CR-89-88-A, CA-91-1205-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 1991). We deny appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer