Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Osondu Stephen Aniukwu, 91-6336 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6336 Visitors: 44
Filed: Feb. 13, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 955 F.2d 42 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Osondu Stephen ANIUKWU, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-6336. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1992. Decided Feb. 13, 1992. Appeal from the United States
More

955 F.2d 42

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Osondu Stephen ANIUKWU, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-6336.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.
Decided Feb. 13, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria, Nos. CR-90-429-A, CA-91-1416-A, Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Osondu Stephen Aniukwu, appellant pro se.

James L. Trump, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Osondu Stephen Aniukwu appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Aniukwu, Nos. CR-90-429-A, CA-91-1416-A (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer