Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

91-6608 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6608 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 08, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 968 F.2d 1211 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Winston LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, and William N. HOBBINS; David Kinder, Plaintiffs, v. Thomas R. CORCORAN, Warden; Elmanus Herndon, Acting Commissioner, In his individual and official capacity; Bishop L. Robinson, Secretary, De
More

968 F.2d 1211

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Winston LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
William N. HOBBINS; David Kinder, Plaintiffs,
v.
Thomas R. CORCORAN, Warden; Elmanus Herndon, Acting
Commissioner, In his individual and official capacity;
Bishop L. Robinson, Secretary, Department of Public Safety,
In his individual and official capacity; William Donald
Schaefer, Governor, State of Maryland, In his individual and
official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6608.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 12, 1991
Decided: July 8, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-90-2118-B)

Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Winston Lloyd appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Lloyd v. Corcoran, No. CA-90-2118-B (D. Md. May 7, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We note that even if Lloyd's claims for injunctive relief could be characterized as capable of repetition yet evading review, thereby avoiding a finding of mootness, they fail on the merits

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer