Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ronald Miles v. G.K. Lewis, Assistant Superintendent, 91-7171 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7171 Visitors: 34
Filed: Jan. 09, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 953 F.2d 638 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald MILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G.K. LEWIS, Assistant Superintendent, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-7171. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 17, 1991. Decided Jan. 9, 1992. Appeal from the United Sta
More

953 F.2d 638

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald MILES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
G.K. LEWIS, Assistant Superintendent, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-7171.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 1991.
Decided Jan. 9, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke, CA-90-627-R, James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.

Ronald Miles, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Ronald Miles appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miles v. Lewis, No. CA-90-627-R (W.D.Va. July 16, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer