Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Edward Girard Lail v. David A. Williams Mary Sue Terry, 91-7324 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7324 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 27, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 978 F.2d 1255 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Edward Girard LAIL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David A. WILLIAMS; Mary Sue Terry, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-7324. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: September 4, 1992 Decided: October 27, 1992 Appeal fro
More

978 F.2d 1255

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward Girard LAIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David A. WILLIAMS; Mary Sue Terry, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 91-7324.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 4, 1992
Decided: October 27, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-91-257-3)

Edward Girard Lail, Appellant Pro Se.

John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

Dismissed.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Edward Lail seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lail v. Williams, No. CA-91-257-3 (E.D. Va. Sep. 25, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer