Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

91-7709 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7709 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 03, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 341 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Harry L. RIZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry GILLESPIE, Lieutenant Colonel; R. P. Lohr, Major; Tony LeeMasters, Sergeant; C.O.I. Yoho; C.O.I. Coleman; C.O.I. Kissner; Ox Clutter, Lieutenant Colonel; Manfred G. Holland, Ex-Warden;
More

972 F.2d 341

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Harry L. RIZER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harry GILLESPIE, Lieutenant Colonel; R. P. Lohr, Major;
Tony LeeMasters, Sergeant; C.O.I. Yoho; C.O.I. Coleman;
C.O.I. Kissner; Ox Clutter, Lieutenant Colonel; Manfred G.
Holland, Ex-Warden; A. V. Dodrill, Commissioner of West
Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7709.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 3, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-86-38-E-S)

Harry L. Rizer, Appellant Pro Se.

Jan L. Fox, Office of The Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

N.D.W.Va.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), Harry L. Rizer appeals from the district court's order denying Rizer's Motion for a New Trial following a jury verdict finding no liability on the part of defendants Gillespie, Lohr, LeMasters, Coleman, Kissner and Holland.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rizer v. Gillespie, No. CA-86-38-E-S (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 26, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

A directed verdict was previously granted to defendants Dodrill, Yoho, and Clutter

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer