Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jesse Edmond v. Four-Way Distributors, Incorporated, 92-1252 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-1252 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 17, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 960 F.2d 145 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jesse EDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOUR-WAY DISTRIBUTORS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. 92-1252. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: April 6, 1992 April 17, 1992 Jesse Edmond, Appellant Pro Se. Before
More

960 F.2d 145

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jesse EDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FOUR-WAY DISTRIBUTORS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

92-1252.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 6, 1992

April 17, 1992

Jesse Edmond, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jesse Edmond appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint for failing to allege facts supporting a claim for damages sufficient for federal diversity jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. See Wiggins v. North American Equitable Life Assurance Co., 644 F.2d 1014, 1017 (4th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edmond v. Four-Way Distribs., Inc., No. CA-911706-6-3K (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer