Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Randy Jay Miller, 92-6026 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6026 Visitors: 64
Filed: Aug. 24, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 343 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy Jay MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-6026. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: May 21, 1992 Decided: August 24, 1992 Appeal from the United States Di
More

972 F.2d 343

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Randy Jay MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6026.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 1992
Decided: August 24, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-89-109-A, CA-91-1435-AM)

Randy Jay Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Constance Harriet Frogale, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Randy Jay Miller appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Miller, Nos. CR-89-109-A, CA-91-1435-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 4 and Oct. 31, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer