Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Tony Efrem Turnage, 92-6398 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6398 Visitors: 55
Filed: Jun. 16, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1446 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony Efrem TURNAGE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-6398. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 1, 1992 Decided: June 16, 1992 Appeal from the United States D
More

966 F.2d 1446

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Tony Efrem TURNAGE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6398.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 16, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-87-437-S, CR-87-439-S, CA-92-584-S)

Tony Efrem Turnage, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael M. Middleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Tony Efrem Turnage appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Turnage, Nos. CR-87-437-S, CR-87-439-S, CA-92-584-S (D. Md. Mar. 17 & Mar. 31, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer