Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr. v. Steve Hollar Faye W. McCauley Edward W. Murray John B. Taylor, 92-6420 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6420 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 17, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1444 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Curtis Leon TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve HOLLAR; Faye W. McCauley; Edward W. Murray; John B. Taylor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6420. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 1, 1992 Decided
More

966 F.2d 1444

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Curtis Leon TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Steve HOLLAR; Faye W. McCauley; Edward W. Murray; John B.
Taylor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6420.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 17, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-601)

Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Hollar, No. CA-91-601 (W.D. Va. Apr. 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer