Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Betty Jean Murphy v. Preston Oldham, Sheriff, 92-6439 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6439 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 17, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1443 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Betty Jean MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Preston OLDHAM, Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-6439. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 1, 1992 Decided: June 17, 1992 Appeal from the United States Dis
More

966 F.2d 1443

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Betty Jean MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Preston OLDHAM, Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-6439.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 17, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-90-604-6)

Betty Jean Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.

Allan R. Gitter, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Betty Jean Murphy appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant, and dismissing Murphy's civil rights action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Murphy v. Oldham, No. CA-90-604-6 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer