Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

David Steward Forrester v. Edward W. Murray, 92-6537 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6537 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 10, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 339 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. David Steward FORRESTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-6537. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: August 10, 1992 Appeal from the United States
More

972 F.2d 339

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David Steward FORRESTER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-6537.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 10, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

David Steward Forrester, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

David Steward Forrester appeals the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Forrester v. Murray, No. CA-91-560-N (E.D. Va. May 6, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer