Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Edward Combs v. William Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 92-6592 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6592 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 06, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 339 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Edward COMBS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-6592. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: August
More

972 F.2d 339

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward COMBS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-6592.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 6, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-92-507-HAR)

Edward Combs, Appellant Pro Se.

Sarah Elizabeth Page, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Edward Combs appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Combs v. Smith, No. CA-92-507-HAR (D. Md. May 11, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer