Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Troy Anthony West v. Sewall B. Smith Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 92-6608 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6608 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 30, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 983 F.2d 1059 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Troy Anthony WEST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sewall B. SMITH; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-6608. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: November 24, 1992 Decided: Dec
More

983 F.2d 1059

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Troy Anthony WEST, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Sewall B. SMITH; Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-6608.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 24, 1992
Decided: December 30, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-91-3100-MJG)

Troy Anthony West, Appellant Pro Se.

Sarah Elizabeth Page, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Troy Anthony West seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. West v. Smith, No. CA-91-3100-MJG (D. Md. May 27, 1992). We also deny West's motion for appointment of counsel. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer