Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Herbert W. Rosier v. Aaron Johnson Attorney General of North Carolina, 92-6736 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6736 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 30, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 983 F.2d 1057 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Herbert W. ROSIER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Aaron JOHNSON; Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-6736. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: October 30, 1992 Decided: December 30,
More

983 F.2d 1057

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Herbert W. ROSIER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Aaron JOHNSON; Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-6736.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 30, 1992
Decided: December 30, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-502-6)

Herbert W. Rosier, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Herbert W. Rosier seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rosier v. Johnson, No. CA-90-502-6 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer