Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pearlie Lee Ingram v. W. Frank Woods, Warden of the Federal Prison Camp, 92-6909 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6909
Filed: Oct. 27, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 978 F.2d 1255 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Pearlie Lee INGRAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. Frank WOODS, Warden of the Federal Prison Camp, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-6909. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: September 28, 1992 Decided: October 27,
More

978 F.2d 1255

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Pearlie Lee INGRAM, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
W. Frank WOODS, Warden of the Federal Prison Camp,
Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-6909.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 28, 1992
Decided: October 27, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-92-255-HC-H)

Pearlie Lee Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.

Paul Martin Newby, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Pearlie Lee Ingram appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ingram v. Woods, No. CA-92-255-HC-H (E.D.N.C. June 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer