Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Charles Edward Jenny, A/K/A Chuck, 92-7013 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-7013 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 31, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 983 F.2d 1058 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Edward JENNY, a/k/a Chuck, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-7013. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: November 13, 1992 Decided: December 31, 1992 Appeal
More

983 F.2d 1058

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles Edward JENNY, a/k/a Chuck, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-7013.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 13, 1992
Decided: December 31, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-6, CA-2-96-E)

Charles Edward Jenny, Appellant Pro Se.

Hunter P. Smith, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

N.D.W.Va.

Affirmed.

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Charles Edward Jenny appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jenny, Nos. CR-87-6, CA-92-96-E (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer