Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael Sindram v. Harry L. Carrico Benjamin Kendrick Donald H. Kent Mary Sue Terry, 92-7028 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-7028 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 30, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 983 F.2d 1057 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Michael SINDRAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harry L. CARRICO; Benjamin Kendrick; Donald H. Kent; Mary Sue Terry, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-7028. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: November 30, 1992 Decid
More

983 F.2d 1057

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael SINDRAM, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Harry L. CARRICO; Benjamin Kendrick; Donald H. Kent; Mary
Sue Terry, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-7028.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 1992
Decided: December 30, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-1493-A)

Michael Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Michael Sindram appeals the district court's denial of his motion to reopen a prior judgment in this case. The district court denied the motion, finding that Sindram's motion presented no valid grounds for relief. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because our review of the record and other materials before us reveals that argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer