Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gwendolyn L. Grooms v. Mobay Chemical Corporation, and Robert Hoguet, 91-2752 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-2752 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 17, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 993 F.2d 1537 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 768 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Gwendolyn L. GROOMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOBAY CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Robert HOGUET, Defendant. No. 91-2752. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted:
More

993 F.2d 1537

66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 768

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gwendolyn L. GROOMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MOBAY CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Robert HOGUET, Defendant.

No. 91-2752.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1993
May 17, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-88-2237-2-18)

Gwendolyn L. Grooms, Appellant Pro Se.

Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., Lucinda Jenkins Haley, Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, Charleston, South Carolina; John Jay Myers, Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

OPINION

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Gwendolyn L. Grooms appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the Defendant and denying her motion for reconsideration in her civil action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-634 (West 1985 & Supp. 1992), and various state law claims. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Grooms v. Mobay Chemical Corp., No. CA-88-2237-2-18 (D.S.C. Aug. 19 and Dec. 10, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Grooms's motion for appointment of counsel

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer