Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gladys A. El-Deyasstty v. Tyson Foods, Incorporated Chip Miller Willie Sydnor, 92-1899 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-1899
Filed: Mar. 22, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 989 F.2d 492 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Gladys A. EL-DEYASSTTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TYSON FOODS, INCORPORATED; Chip Miller; Willie Sydnor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-1899. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: March 1, 1993 Decided: March 22,
More

989 F.2d 492

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gladys A. EL-DEYASSTTY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TYSON FOODS, INCORPORATED; Chip Miller; Willie Sydnor,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-1899.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 1, 1993
Decided: March 22, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-92-121-R)

Gladys A. El-Deyasstty, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Raymond Jones, Gilker & Jones, Mountainburg, Arkansas; Robert Ferrell Newman, Thompson, Smithers, Newman & Wade, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Gladys A. El-Deyasstty appeals from the district court's order dismissing her sexual harassment claim. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that the district court's findings are supported by substantial evidence. Thus, this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. El-Deyasstty v. Tyson Foods, Inc., No. CA-92-121-R (E.D. Va. July 13, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer