Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lewis G. Campbell v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 92-1967 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-1967 Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 12, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 986 F.2d 1412 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lewis G. CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United States Department of Labor, Respondent. Nos. 92-1967. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: February 1, 1993 Decide
More

986 F.2d 1412

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lewis G. CAMPBELL, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United
States Department of Labor, Respondent.

Nos. 92-1967.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 12, 1993

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (BLA)

Lewis G. Campbell, Petitioner Pro Se.

Dorothy L. Page, Barbara J. Johnson, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Lewis G. Campbell seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. # 8E8E # 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1992).

2

The Director now concedes that Campbell is entitled to benefits, and counsel for the Respondent has advised the Court that modification proceedings, under 33 U.S.C. § 922 (1988), have begun. Because the denial of benefits to Campbell is now subject to modification, we dismiss this petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer