Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Martin Sterenbuch, and Diane Sterenbuch v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, 92-2056 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-2056 Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 30, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 12 F.3d 206 73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 94-582 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Martin STERENBUCH, Petitioner-Appellant, and Diane Sterenbuch, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-2056. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
More

12 F.3d 206

73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 94-582

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Martin STERENBUCH, Petitioner-Appellant,
and
Diane Sterenbuch, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-2056.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 30, 1993.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

Martin Sterenbuch, Appellant Pro Se.

Gary R. Allen, Ann Belanger Durney and Scott Patrick Towers, for Appellee.

U.S.T.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, PHILLIPS, WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Martin Sterenbuch appeals from the decision of the tax court determining a deficiency in his 1977 income tax liability in the amount of $11,068.68.* Our review of the record and the tax court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Therefore, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Sterenbuch v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 88-19506 (Tax Ct. June 10, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Although Diane Sterenbuch was a party in the tax court proceedings, she did not sign the notice of appeal. Consequently, she is not a party to this appeal. Covington v. Allsbrook, 636 F.2d 63, 64 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 914 (1981)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer