Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

V. Marie A. Faltas, M.D., M.P.H., on Behalf of Herself and Classes She Represents, Larry McCants in His Official Capacity, 92-2498 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-2498 Visitors: 21
Filed: Feb. 16, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 986 F.2d 1413 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. v. Marie A. FALTAS, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of herself and classes she represents, Plaintiff-Appellant, Larry McCANTS, in his official capacity, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-2498. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Sub
More

986 F.2d 1413

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
v.
Marie A. FALTAS, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of herself and
classes she represents, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Larry McCANTS, in his official capacity, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-2498.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 16, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-2786-3-17BC)

Marie A. Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Marie A. Faltas, a resident alien of South Carolina, appeals from the district court's order summarily dismissing her civil action for injunctive relief. Faltas sought court orders enfranchising aliens and mandating telephonic voting procedures for the November 1992 general election. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Faltas v. McCants, No. CA-92-2786-3-17BC (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer