Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

92-6318 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6318 Visitors: 59
Filed: Jun. 18, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 995 F.2d 1063 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Gary Patrick HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA; The Mayor of Charlottesville, Virginia; The County of Albemarle, Virginia; The Board of Directors, Albemarle County; Michael McMann, Superintende
More

995 F.2d 1063

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gary Patrick HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA; The Mayor of
Charlottesville, Virginia; The County of Albemarle,
Virginia; The Board of Directors, Albemarle County;
Michael McMann, Superintendent, Charlottesville Albemarle
Joint Security Complex; Officer Todd Stanley, Property
Supervisor, Charlottesville Albemarle Joint Security
Complex, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6318.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 4, 1993.
Decided: June 18, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-302-R)

Gary Patrick Hunter, Appellant Pro Se.

Stephanie Ann Rader, William Stephen Scott, Paxson, Smith, Gilliam & Scott, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Gary Patrick Hunter appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hunter v. City of Charlottesville, No. 91-302-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 28, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer