Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kevin Michael Cook v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, 92-6337 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6337 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 17, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 995 F.2d 1062 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Kevin Michael COOK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-6337. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: December 14, 1992. Decided:
More

995 F.2d 1062

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kevin Michael COOK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-6337.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1992.
Decided: June 17, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-539-N)

Kevin Michael Cook, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Kevin Cook seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer