Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dennis Deon Chandler v. C/o Richardson Administration, Danville City Jail R. J. Jones, Jr. W. W. Tucker, Sergeant Jim Hayton Sergeant Karnes, 92-7008 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-7008 Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 04, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 8 F.3d 817 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dennis Deon CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C/O RICHARDSON; Administration, Danville City Jail; R. J. Jones, Jr.; W. W. Tucker, Sergeant; Jim Hayton; Sergeant Karnes, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-7008. United States Court of Appea
More

8 F.3d 817

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dennis Deon CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C/O RICHARDSON; Administration, Danville City Jail; R. J.
Jones, Jr.; W. W. Tucker, Sergeant; Jim Hayton;
Sergeant Karnes, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-7008.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 29, 1992.
Decided: November 4, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Dennis Deon Chandler, Appellant Pro Se.

W. Carrington Thompson, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Dennis Deon Chandler appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chandler v. Richardson, No. CA-91-248 (W.D. Va. Aug. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer