Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Timothy Walton v. William Martin, and Franklin County Jail Quint Overton Vicky Meadows, 92-7109 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-7109 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 11, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 983 F.2d 1059 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Timothy WALTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William MARTIN, Defendant-Appellee, and FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL; Quint Overton; Vicky Meadows, Defendants. No. 92-7109. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: December 14,
More

983 F.2d 1059

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Timothy WALTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William MARTIN, Defendant-Appellee,
and FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL; Quint Overton; Vicky Meadows, Defendants.

No. 92-7109.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1992
Decided: January 11, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-12-R)

Timothy Walton, Appellant Pro Se.

William Heywood Fralin, Jr., Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Timothy Walton appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walton v. Martin, No. CA-92-12-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 1, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer