Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jose Perez v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service Richard A. Lanham, Jr., Commissioner, 92-7212 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-7212 Visitors: 36
Filed: Feb. 25, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 986 F.2d 1414 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jose PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Richard A. Lanham, Jr., Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-7212. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Fe
More

986 F.2d 1414

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jose PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE;
Richard A. Lanham, Jr., Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-7212.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 25, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-92-2788-L)

Jose Perez, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jose Perez appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perez v. District Director, INS, No. CA-92-2788-L (D. Md. Oct. 21, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer