Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Harold Junior Lakey v. Larry W. Huffman Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 92-7233 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-7233 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jun. 17, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 995 F.2d 1063 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Harold Junior LAKEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Larry W. HUFFMAN; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-7233. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: February 18, 1993. D
More

995 F.2d 1063

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Harold Junior LAKEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Larry W. HUFFMAN; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-7233.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 18, 1993.
Decided: June 17, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-370-R)

Harold Junior Lakey, Appellant Pro Se.

Katherine Baldwin Toone, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Harold Junior Lakey seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lakey v. Huffman, No. CA-90-370-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 18, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer