Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Linwood E. Cosby v. D. W. Barnes J. G. Wheeler, Food Service Supervisor, 92-7236 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-7236 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 09, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 995 F.2d 1062 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Linwood E. COSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. W. BARNES; J. G. Wheeler, Food Service Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-7236. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: January 29, 1993 Decided: June 9, 1993
More

995 F.2d 1062

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Linwood E. COSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
D. W. BARNES; J. G. Wheeler, Food Service Supervisor,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-7236.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 29, 1993
Decided: June 9, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-834-AM)

Linwood E. Cosby, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Linwood E. Cosby filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer