986 F.2d 1416
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Scott Lewis RENDELMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-7237.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 25, 1993
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-88-3-S, CA-92-3285-S)
Scott Lewis Rendelman, Appellant Pro Se. Peter M. Semel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Scott Lewis Rendelman appeals from the district court's order which dismissed Rendelman's motions "For Court to Order A Reply" and for "Renewal of Motion Under Section 2255." Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rendelman, Nos. CR-88-3-S, CA-92-3285-S (D. Md. Nov. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
