Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Qusan A. Qadhafi, A/K/A Donnell Lightfoot, A/K/A Stephen Donnell Carter v. Edward W. Murray, Director, 92-7244 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-7244 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 22, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 14 F.3d 596 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Qusan A. QADHAFI, a/k/a Donnell LIGHTFOOT, a/k/a Stephen Donnell Carter, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-7244. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 199
More

14 F.3d 596

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Qusan A. QADHAFI, a/k/a Donnell LIGHTFOOT, a/k/a Stephen
Donnell Carter, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-7244.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 20, 1993.
Decided Dec. 22, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Qusan A. Qadhafi, appellant pro se.

Robert H. Anderson, III, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Qusan A. Qadhafi seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Qadhafi v. Murray, No. CA-91-1430-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer