Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re: Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr., 92-8095 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-8095 Visitors: 39
Filed: Feb. 26, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 986 F.2d 1413 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. IN RE: Marvin Leon GRIMM, Jr., Petitioner. No. 92-8095. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: February 1, 1993 Decided: February 26, 1993 On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr., Petitioner P
More

986 F.2d 1413

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
IN RE: Marvin Leon GRIMM, Jr., Petitioner.

No. 92-8095.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 26, 1993

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr., a Virginia inmate, brought this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the district court to grant him a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). The district court denied Grimm habeas relief, finding that his § 2254 petition was successive and denying Grimm's motion for reconsideration. Grimm v. Terry, No. CA-92-367 (E.D. Va. Sept. 18 and Oct. 30, 1992).

2

A mandamus petition may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Moreover, a mandamus petitioner must show that there are no other means by which he could obtain the requested relief. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826-27 (4th Cir. 1987). Grimm could have sought review of the district court's denial of § 2254 relief by filing a notice of appeal.

3

Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer