Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

93-1614 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-1614 Visitors: 75
Filed: Nov. 16, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 9 F.3d 1543 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James E. HART, Petitioner, v. Norma A. Coal Company; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor; Old Republic Insurance Company, Respondents. No. 93-1614. United States Court of Appeals, F
More

9 F.3d 1543

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James E. HART, Petitioner,
v.
Norma A. Coal Company; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor; Old Republic Insurance Company,
Respondents.

No. 93-1614.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 20, 1993.
Decided: November 16, 1993.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

James E. Hart, Petitioner Pro Se.

Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, Arter & Hadden, Washington, D.C.; Patricia May Nece, Robert P. Hines, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1993). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Hart v. Norma A. Coal Co., No. 90-2187-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 28, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer