Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Bonnie Eugene Williams, Jr., 93-6010 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6010 Visitors: 36
Filed: Feb. 26, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 986 F.2d 1417 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bonnie Eugene WILLIAMS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-6010. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: February 1, 1993 Decided: February 26, 1993 Appeal from th
More

986 F.2d 1417

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bonnie Eugene WILLIAMS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-6010.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 26, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-17-ST)

Bonnie Eugene Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas J. Ashcraft, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Bonnie Eugene Williams, Jr., appeals from the district court's order dismissing his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (West Supp. 1992). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams, No. CR-90-17-ST (W.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer