Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ronnie Blocker v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, 93-6208 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6208 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 28, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 996 F.2d 1210 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronnie BLOCKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-6208. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted:
More

996 F.2d 1210

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronnie BLOCKER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General for the State of South Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-6208.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 28, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-1419-3-3AH)

Ronnie Blocker, Appellant Pro Se.

Larry Cleveland Batson, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Columbia, South Carolina; Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Ronnie Blocker appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Blocker v. South Carolina, No. CA-92-1419-3-3AH (D.S.C. Jan. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer