Filed: Aug. 03, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 1 F.3d 1233 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Maurice JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carlton EDWARDS, Sergeant, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-6249. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 9, 1993. Decided: August 3, 1993. Appeal from the United States Di
Summary: 1 F.3d 1233 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Maurice JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carlton EDWARDS, Sergeant, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-6249. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 9, 1993. Decided: August 3, 1993. Appeal from the United States Dis..
More
1 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Maurice JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Carlton EDWARDS, Sergeant, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-6249.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 9, 1993.
Decided: August 3, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1036-2)
Maurice Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
David L. Ross, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia; Patrick B. Kelly, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
1
Maurice Johnson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Edwards, No. CA-92-1036-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
