Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ronald Jerry Sawyer v. Edward W. Murray R. A. Young Dave Garraghty Major Walker, 93-6301 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6301 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 28, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 993 F.2d 1539 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald Jerry SAWYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY; R. A. Young; Dave Garraghty; Major Walker, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-6301. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: May 3, 1993 Decided: May 28,
More

993 F.2d 1539

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald Jerry SAWYER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY; R. A. Young; Dave Garraghty; Major
Walker, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6301.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 3, 1993
Decided: May 28, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-91-1006)

Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Ronald Jerry Sawyer appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sawyer v. Murray, No. CA-91-1006 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer