Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Leon White v. Haskin, Lieutenant Forbe, Lieutenant Wyatt, Lieutenant, Robert Leon White v. Haskin, Lieutenant, 93-6336 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6336 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 24, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 996 F.2d 1213 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Leon WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HASKIN, Lieutenant; Forbe, Lieutenant; Wyatt, Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees. Robert Leon WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HASKIN, Lieutenant, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 93-6336, 93-6337.
More

996 F.2d 1213

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Leon WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HASKIN, Lieutenant; Forbe, Lieutenant; Wyatt, Lieutenant,
Defendants-Appellees.
Robert Leon WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HASKIN, Lieutenant, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 93-6336, 93-6337.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 24, 1993.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-92-1556-AM, CA-92-1559-AM)

Robert Leon White, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

In both of these actions Robert Leon White filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In each case, the district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer