Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

David Barksdale, Jr. v. Halifax County Jail Eugene Shorts, Sheriff W. K. Daniel James O. Edmonson, 93-6377 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6377 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 25, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 996 F.2d 1210 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. David BARKSDALE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HALIFAX COUNTY JAIL; Eugene Shorts, Sheriff; W. K. Daniel; James O. Edmonson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-6377. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 7, 199
More

996 F.2d 1210

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David BARKSDALE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HALIFAX COUNTY JAIL; Eugene Shorts, Sheriff; W. K. Daniel;
James O. Edmonson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6377.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 25, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1547-AM)

David Barksdale, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

David Barksdale filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and directed the Plaintiff to pay the fee or present an explanation of his inability to pay. When Plaintiff failed to obey this order, the district court dismissed the case without prejudice. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 (1990). Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer