Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ronald F. Robinson v. Audrey B. Evans Lloyd Bowen Warden, Maryland Penitentiary Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 93-6507 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6507 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 05, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 2 F.3d 1149 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald F. ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Audrey B. EVANS; Lloyd Bowen; Warden, Maryland Penitentiary; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-6507. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
More

2 F.3d 1149

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald F. ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Audrey B. EVANS; Lloyd Bowen; Warden, Maryland
Penitentiary; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-6507.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 16, 1993.
Decided: August 5, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-92-1014-B)

Ronald F. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Diane Elizabeth Keller, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Ronald F. Robinson seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Evans, No. CA-92-1014-B (D. Md. May 5, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer