Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Linwood White v. Jon P. Galley, Warden Paul Davis, Parole Chairman Maryland Parole Commission, 93-6521 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6521 Visitors: 23
Filed: Nov. 15, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 12 F.3d 206 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Linwood WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon P. GALLEY, Warden; Paul Davis, Parole Chairman; Maryland Parole Commission, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-6521. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 25, 1993. Deci
More

12 F.3d 206

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Linwood WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jon P. GALLEY, Warden; Paul Davis, Parole Chairman;
Maryland Parole Commission, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6521.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 25, 1993.
Decided Nov. 15, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, No. CA-92-2996; Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge.

Linwood White, pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Glenn William Bell, Office of the Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for defendants-Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Galley, No. CA-92-2996 (D.Md. Apr. 8, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer