Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rodney Rogers, A/K/A Koseem C. Sanders v. United States, 93-6596 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6596
Filed: Aug. 06, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 1 F.3d 1234 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Rodney ROGERS, a/k/a Koseem C. Sanders, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-6596. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 16, 1993. Decided: August 6, 1993. Appeal fr
More

1 F.3d 1234

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Rodney ROGERS, a/k/a Koseem C. Sanders, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-6596.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 16, 1993.
Decided: August 6, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-92-994)

Rodney Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Rodney Rogers filed a Bivens* action and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer