Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jackie Lee Brown v. United States, 93-6652 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6652 Visitors: 21
Filed: Nov. 15, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 9 F.3d 1543 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jackie Lee BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-6652. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: October 25, 1993. Decided: November 15, 1993. Appeal from the United St
More

9 F.3d 1543

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jackie Lee BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-6652.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 25, 1993.
Decided: November 15, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News.

Jackie Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Alan Mark Salsbury, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for recusal and his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Brown v. United States, Nos. CR-92-33-NN; CA93-61-NN (E.D. Va. May 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Additionally, we deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer