Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Larry James Terry v. Patty L. Huffman, 93-6703 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6703 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 27, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 8 F.3d 820 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Larry James TERRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patty L. HUFFMAN, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-6703. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: September 27, 1993. Decided: October 27, 1993. Appeal from the United States
More

8 F.3d 820

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry James TERRY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Patty L. HUFFMAN, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93-6703.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 27, 1993.
Decided: October 27, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Larry James Terry, Appellant Pro Se.

Oliver Lewis Norrell, III, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Terry v. Huffman, No. CA-92-930-R (W.D. Va. June 30, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for an evidentiary hearing is denied.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer