Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Henry William Lewis v. David K. Smith, 93-6711 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6711 Visitors: 27
Filed: Nov. 16, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 9 F.3d 1544 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Henry William LEWIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David K. SMITH, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-6711. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: October 25, 1993. Decided: November 16, 1993. Appeal from the United States
More

9 F.3d 1544

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Henry William LEWIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David K. SMITH, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93-6711.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 25, 1993.
Decided: November 16, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Henry William Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

Eugene Paul Murphy, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Smith, No. CA-92-367-R (W.D. Va. June 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer