Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dennis E. Yarrell v. Tillie I. Nunnelee, and Mitchell D. Norton Thomas S. Payne, III Nelson Sheppard, 93-6889 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6889 Visitors: 56
Filed: Oct. 29, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 8 F.3d 823 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dennis E. YARRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tillie I. NUNNELEE, Defendant-Appellee, and Mitchell D. Norton; Thomas S. Payne, III; Nelson Sheppard, Defendants. No. 93-6889. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Se
More

8 F.3d 823

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dennis E. YARRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Tillie I. NUNNELEE, Defendant-Appellee,
and Mitchell D. Norton; Thomas S. Payne, III; Nelson
Sheppard, Defendants.

No. 93-6889.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 27, 1993.
Decided: October 29, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

Dennis E. Yarrell, Appellant Pro Se.

LaVee Hamer Jackson, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yarrell v. Nunnelee, No. CA-91-786-CRT-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 1992; July 30, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer